Watada Not Allowed to Question Legality of Iraq War in Court
Wednesday, 17 January 2007 09:07
Share Link: Share Link: Bookmark Google Yahoo MyWeb Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Myspace Reddit Ma.gnolia Technorati Stumble Upon Yahoo Bookmarks MSN Live Yigg

 1/17/07:  Lt. Ehren Watada, who is facing up to 6 years in prison for refusing to fight in the war on Iraq, goes to court-martial trial on Feb. 5.  He intended to defend himself in court by arguing that the Iraq war is illegal and as an officer it would be illegal for him to take part in it.  But a military judge has now decided this defense will not be admissible in court.

Judge Lt. Col. John Head released his decision Tuesday (1/16) that "whether the war is lawful" cannot be judged in military court because it is a political question.  Army regulations require that any war launched must comply with the United Nations charter, which does not allow pre-emptive wars or wars of aggression.  (One would think that army regulations would be acceptable inside a military court, but apparently not in Watada's case).

In addition to refusing to deploy, Watada has also been charged with "conduct unbecoming an officer" for making public criticisms of the war, including the following from a speech at a Veterans for Peace conference Aug. 12:

Though the American soldier wants to do right, the illegitimacy of the occupation itself, the policies of this administration and the rules of engagement of desperate field commanders will ultimately force them to be party to war crimes.

Watada had planned to argue that this is protected first amendment speech, but this argument is not being allowed in court either.  The Seattle Times reported:

Head ruled that there are limits to the free-speech rights of military personnel and that a military panel should decide whether Watada's criticism of the war amounted to officer misconduct that could have endangered the morale, loyalty and discipline of troops.

In response to this outrageous ruling, Watada's attorney Eric Seitz told the Seattle Times, "We have been stripped of every defense. This is a disciplinary system, not a justice system. Otherwise, we would have been entitled to defend ourselves."

The Iraq war is quite clearly illegal.  Wars of aggression are war crimes under Nuremburg.  Moreover, the conduct of the occupation has been nothing but war crimes, from torture, massacres of civilians, the use of depleted uranium and white phosphorous chemicals, and attacks on whole cities (including hospitals) like in Fallujah.  In refusing to allow Watada to argue in court that the Iraq war is illegal, the government is clearly afraid of what it would mean for this truth to get out in an official court proceeding.  And they are afraid of what kind of example this would set for the many thousands more troops who are increasingly opposed to the war.

This outrageous ruling makes it all the more imperative to build support for Watada including at his upcoming trial Feb. 5.  And to make the fact that this war is illegal and unjust something no one in society can ignore.

---

Source: "Watada can't base defense on war's legality, judge says", Seattle Times, 1/17/07.

For more information on how to support Lt. Watada, visit http://thankyoult.org/.

Also read Lt. Watada: A Man of Conscience and Courage on worldcantwait.org.

To find out just why the Iraq war is illegal and a war crime, check out this DVD of testimony from the Bush Crimes Commission:

Available at our online store


Quote this article on your site Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.



Preview :

 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

The World Can't Wait • 305 West Broadway, #185, New York, NY, 10013 • (866) 973-4463

rapidshare downloads